CAYLEE ANTHONY and HALEIGH CUMMINGS: Sworn affidavit to U.S. Court is a bell that will never stop ringing

by Timothy Charles Holmseth on September 14, 2017, 9:10 P.M. CST

Do I have PROOF of what really happened to Caylee Anthony and HaLeigh Cummings?

Do I have the involved parties on tape talking about it?

If I don’t – I must now be charged with perjury (filing a false affidavit) or sued in a civil court.   

I’ll explain.

The U.S. District Court in the Northern District of Florida has remanded my recently filed NOTICE OF REMOVAL back to the First Judicial Circuit Court in Santa Rosa County, Florida citing lack of Subject Matter jurisdiction.    

I filed the request to the U.S. Court after (yet another) Florida resident requested a State court to force me to remove legally published articles.

There is a group of individuals that are individually named in multiple court filings in a pending Minnesota case that are scheming to petition the Florida courts for ‘domestic violence law’ retraining orders/injunctions against me; they simply file the petition (which is free) and hope a judge in Florida will grant a restraining order against a man in Minnesota because the Minnesotan did not attend the court hearing (i.e. take an un-planned expensive Florida vacation).

The catch is - the petitioner tries to convince the judge to order something that was legally published long ago that went completely un-challenged for years - to be REMOVED from the Web.

However – in this instance - the Florida State Court in Santa Rosa County did not order me to remove anything that was already published.

That may be why the federal court remanded.

While I am not a lawyer, I took an honest shot at proving federal question.

The point is – I MADE A SWORN STATEMENT about an international child sex trafficking operation that involved people claiming they work undercover for the FBI and CIA - including a man that claimed he was an "undercover pedophile".

Below is a portion.

THIS COURT HAS FEDERAL QUESTION JURISDICTION

  1. The U.S. District Court has Federal Question Jurisdiction under 28 U.S. Code § 1331 because - - - - - ’S Petition to the Florida State Court includes a request for the State of Florida to force HOLMSETH, a Minnesota resident, to remove legally published content protected by the 1st Amendment from his online publication(s) that contains evidence of federal crimes by - - - - - ’S attorney, - - - - - , and shows multiple members of her law office staff, possessed child rape pornography of a kidnapped child in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2251- Sexual Exploitation of Children (Production of child pornography) and 18 U.S.C. § 2252- Certain activities relating to material involving the sexual exploitation of minors (Possession, distribution and receipt of child pornography).
  1. The U.S. District Court has Federal Question Jurisdiction under 28 U.S. Code § 1331 because - - - - - ’S Petition to the Florida State Court includes a request for the State of Florida to force HOLMSETH, a Minnesota resident, to remove legally published content protected by the 1st Amendment from his online publication(s) that contains evidence and/or information about a federal crime committed by JOHN REGAN, a convicted sex offender, who was the father of a - - - - -  law office employee, JEREMIAH REGAN, and who claimed to be both an FBI and CIA agent during the search for HaLeigh Cummings in violation of 18 U.S. Code § 912 - Officer or employee of the United States.
  1. The U.S. Court has Supplemental Jurisdiction under 28 U.S. Code § 1367 because - - - - - ’S Petition to the Florida State Court includes a request for the Court situated in Santa Rosa County, Florida, to force HOLMSETH to remove legally published content about the abuse of prisoners in Santa Rosa County; abuse that was alleged online by - - - - -  and - - - - -  to advance a blackmail scheme against the County of Santa Rosa, Florida, which was successful – leaving the alleged prisoner abuse violations of the 8th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution un-investigated.
  1. The U.S. Court has Supplemental Jurisdiction under 28 U.S. Code § 1367 because Prima Facie evidence shows - - - - -  and - - - - -  successfully blackmailed/extorted somebody within the Santa Rosa County legal system; and could do it again. HOLMSETH’S cannot be guaranteed a fair hearing in the Florida State court.
  1. The U.S. Court has Federal Question Jurisdiction under 28 U.S. Code § 1331 because - - - - - ’S Petition to the Florida State Court includes a direct reference to, and relies upon the credibility of, a domestic violence protection order obtained by - - - - -  against HOLMSETH in the Divorce Division (DVCE) of the Broward County, Florida courts, which HOLMSETH maintains and asserts was fraudulently obtained by - - - - -  in violation of 18 U.S. Code § 241 - Conspiracy against rights.
  1. The U.S. Court has Federal Question Jurisdiction under 28 U.S. Code § 1331 because TINA CHURCH, an associate of - - - - -  and other conspirator named in the Minnesota court case, telephoned HOLMSETH and warned him she advised everybody HOLMSETH named in his Minnesota case Affidavit to file retraining orders against HOLMSETH in violation of  18 U.S. Code § 241 - Conspiracy against rights.
  1. The U.S. District Court has Federal Question Jurisdiction under 28 U.S. Code § 1331 because HOLMSETH has evidence - - - - - ’S attorney - - - - -  is conspiring with - - - - - , and others associated with SPECIALIZED INVESTIGATIVE CONSULTANTS INC (hereby collectively referred to as THE GROUP), against HOLMSETH, in violation of 18 U.S. Code § 241 - Conspiracy against rights; in effort to violate HOLMSETH’S 1st Amendment protections.
  1. The conspiracy against rights violations against HOLMSETH have been perpetually occurring since 2009 after HOLMSETH, a journalist, and subsequently an FBI witness, learned information about the kidnapping of HaLeigh Ann-Marie Cummings, 5, Satsuma Florida.
  1. HaLeigh Cummings, 5, was reported missing from her Satsuma, Florida home on February 10, 2009. An Amber Alert was issued for HaLeigh. The Federal Bureau of Investigation is presently seeking information from the public regarding the whereabouts of HaLeigh.
  1.  HOLMSETH’S 1st Amendment protections are being unlawfully targeted and violated by THE GROUP because HOLMSETH acquired secret details about on-goings within THE GROUP that unlawfully caused HaLeigh Cummings to be sexually exploited, disappear, and be transported across state lines.
  1. HOLMSETH’s rights are being violated because he acquired and possesses evidence HaLeigh Cummings was transported across state lines by TINA CHURCH and others in THE GROUP, in violation of 18 U.S. Code § 1201 – Kidnapping; CHURCH not a being a relative to HaLeigh Cummings as defined in Section G of same.
  1. HOLMSETH’S rights are being violated because he acquired and possesses evidence TINA CHURCH, in conspiracy and careful forethought with others in THE GROUP, violated 18 U.S. Code § 1512 - Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant, because HaLeigh Cummings was a witness to a murder that occurred at 202 Green Lane, Satsuma, Florida.
  1. The rights violations under 18 U.S. Code § 241 - Conspiracy against rights include violations against HOLMSETH by the CITY OF EAST GRAND FORKS, MINNESOTA and the EAST GRAND FORKS POLICE DEPARTMENT who conspired with THE GROUP against HOLMSETH’S 1st, 2nd, and 4th Amendment protections.
  1. HOLMSETH is receiving very serious threats from someone calling from telephone numbers and speaking into a voice changer and demanding HOLMSETH remove his websites from publication. The threats are made from numbers of PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP (the President’s resorts and Trump Organization), CLINTON GLOBAL, STATE OF FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL PAM BONDI, FLORIDA GOVERNOR RICK SCOTT, CNN, REPUBLICAN PARTY, NEW JERSEY GOVERNOR CHRIS CHRISTIE, TEXAS EQUUSEARCH, warning HOLMSETH to remove his websites or very bad things will happen to HOLMSETH and his family including a threat to kidnap HOLMSETH’S grand child in violation of 18 U.S. Code § 875 - Interstate communications
  1. HOLMSETH’S rights are being violated by THE GROUP because HOLMSETH obtained testimonial evidence from an employee of - - - - -  - - - - -  LAW OFFICE P.A. that child rape pornography had been created of HaLeigh Cummings and was in the possession of - - - - -  - - - - -  LAW OFFICE P.A. in violation of 18 U.S. Code § 2251 - Sexual exploitation of children
  1. HOLMSETH learned - - - - -  - - - - -  LAW OFFICE P.A. gave a CD containing explicit photos of HaLeigh’s Cummings’ damaged vagina to a Florida DCF social worker named BONNIE WARNER during an undocumented exchange in a gas station parking lot after hours. WARNER discussed the HaLeigh Cummings case with - - - - - ’S private investigator, WILLIAM STAUBS on the telephone from her home after business hours. HOLMSETH captured WARNER on recording admitting/confirming receipt of the CD that contained the explicit photos of HaLeigh Cummings, and stating she never gave it to her supervisor in violation of 18 U.S. Code § 2251 - Sexual exploitation of children.
  1. HOLMSETH was told by WAYANNE KRUGER, who was the official advocate of CRYSTAL SHEFFIELD (the mother of HaLeigh Cummings, 5) that HaLeigh witnessed her father, RONALD CUMMINGS, murder a man in their trailer home at 202 Green Lane, Satsuma, Florida, shortly before HaLeigh Cummings vanished. KRUGER said RONALD CUMMINGS beat the man’s head in with a pistol. KRUGER said HaLeigh watched her father drag the man’s dead body into the woods.
  1. HOLMSETH was told by WAYANNE KRUGER that during the time of the aforementioned murder, there was an argument that involved several adults. During the argument JOHN MARCUS SHEFFIELD who is HaLeigh’s maternal grandfather, yelled ‘he’s letting people fuck my grand daughter!”
  1. - - - - -  is conspiring against HOLMSETH’S rights because in 2011, - - - - - ’S private investigator, WILLIAM STAUBS, through his attorney Doug Roberts, advised - - - - -  that he purged his (STAUB’S) computer and file system off all files that - - - - -  was seeking from STAUBS via a subpoena; and that he sent the files to HOLMSETH.
  1. The audio files HOLMSETH received un-solicited from STAUBS contain audio recordings that contain voices that include - - - - -  - - - - - , WILLIAM STAUBS, JEREMIAH REGAN, MATTHEW STAUBS, - - - - -  - - - - - , and PAULA ANDREWS.
  1. The un-solicited audio files HOLMSETH received have placed HOLMSETH in danger because the content of the files implicates multiple persons in criminal activity. The content is also very embarrassing to many. 
  1. - - - - -  - - - - -  was engaged in an ongoing sexual relationship with JEREMIAH REGAN, an unknown drifter that appeared from nowhere to work for - - - - -  LAW OFFICE P.A. and become the co-administrator of a facility called the HaLeigh Bug Center which was set up by - - - - -  - - - - -  and her convicted felon (federal fraud) husband - - - - -  - - - - -  to obtain investigative tips (even though they are not law enforcement) and accept cash donations.
  1. - - - - -  - - - - -  accused JEREMIAH REGAN of ‘rubbing all over her’.
  1. JEREMIAH REGAN and WILLIAM STAUBS laugh and giggle as WILLIAM STAUBS asks JEREMIAH REGAN ‘did you nut?’ (ejaculate) (when he had sex with - - - - -  - - - - - ) and they break out in laughter when JEREMIAH REGAN indicates he ejaculated three times.
  1. JEREMIAH REGAN provided graphic details to others about - - - - -  - - - - - ’S body and feminine hygiene and called - - - - -  - - - - - and - - - - -.
  1. JERMEMIAH REGAN threatened to sue - - - - -  - - - - -  for sexual harassment because he was working for - - - - - law office when they had sex.
  1. JEREMIAH REGAN telephoned - - - - -  - - - - -  and confessed ‘I fucked your wife’.
  1. - - - - -  - - - - -  later told HOLMSETH during an interview that WILLIAM STAUBS shoved a gun in JEREMIAH REGAN’S mouth and forced JEREMIAH REGAN to call - - - - -  - - - - -  and falsely confess to having sex with his wife - - - - -  - - - - - .
  1. - - - - -  - - - - -  told JEREMIAH REGAN she secured a $231 Million biofuel contract for a company called Alterative Biofuels Technologies Inc. (ABT) through (former) Florida Governor Charlie Christ. - - - - -  - - - - -  told JEREMIAH REGAN he could have an executive position at ABT if he kept his mouth shut.
  1. - - - - -  - - - - -  telephoned HOLMSETH and said he gave JEREMIAH REGAN a job at his biofuel company ABT.
  1. ABT was seized by the FBI during the federal RICO investigation against now convicted Ponzi schemer SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN.
  1. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN’S Ponzi scheme involved matters connected to convicted sex offender JEFFREY EPSTEIN who is notorious for allegedly flying wealthy businessmen and political leaders to ‘Pedophile Island’ on the ‘Lolita Express’ to commit atrocities against children. 
  1. - - - - -  - - - - -  forwarded internal work-product law office emails to HOLMSETH pertaining to the search for the missing child HaLeigh Cummings which came from her law office - - - - -  L. - - - - -  P.A. The emails were also sent to ROTHSTEIN, ROSENFELDT, and ADLER.
  1. - - - - -  - - - - -  advised HOLMSETH her lawyer was Pedro Dijols Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, Adler. Attorney Dijols confirmed to HOLMSETH he was - - - - - ’S attorney.
  1. JEREMIAH REGAN confided very sensitive sexual information to - - - - -  - - - - -  about his childhood and father, JOHN REGAN, which - - - - -  - - - - -  did not hold secure and told others.
  1. WILLIAM STAUBS told HOLMSETH that JOHN REGAN molested his own son, JEREMIAH REGAN.
  1. - - - - -  - - - - -  told PAULA ANDREWS that JEREMIAH REGAN was abused as a child, was a nut case, and disappeared for nine months without telling his family his whereabouts. 
  1. JOHN REGAN is a convicted child molester that dressed as a pastor and told multiple persons during the search for the missing child HaLeigh Cummings that he was working undercover for the FBI as a pedophile. JOHN REGAN also told multiple persons he was a CIA agent.
  1. WAYANNE KRUGER told HOLMSETH that JOHN REGAN told her the FBI had HaLeigh in their possession but wanted to keep it quiet.
  1. WAYANNE KRUGER told HOLMSETH that JOHN REGAN was part of an infant sales operation in Florida that involved - - - - -  - - - - -  and - - - - -  - - - - - . KRUGER described the operation that involved accessing babies from young unwed expecting mothers and/or exploitable illegal aliens fearing deportation. KRUGER said the operation had operatives inside Florida DCF. KRUGER said the human child trafficking involved forged medical documents and dossiers to move children under two years old through the United States Embassy and onto international flights to purchasers including purchasers in Belgium in violation of 18 U.S. Code § 2251 - Sexual exploitation of children.

Go Back